Fiji
slipping back to anti-Indian regime
One
of the more striking differences between Voreqe Bainimarama's coup and the
others were the hints that it was really an Indian counter-coup.
Somehow,
it was believed, Bainimarama had used his indigenous army to end racism.
Writing in the Pacific Economic Bulletin, Professor Biman Prasad of the University of the South
Pacific, makes it plain that this is no longer so.
Fiji is becoming anti Indian again. This is from his report:
The
government's stated objective since it overthrew the Qarase government has
been for racial and political equality and meritocracy in appointments and
promotions in the civil service. Immediately after the coup, the majority
of Indo-Fijians felt that there would be decisive changes from the
policies of the past 20 years. Ethnic considerations prevailed in the
appointment of staff in the civil service, in the allocation of
scholarships, in government grants and in the delivery of state
services.
Sadly,
however, the intentions and the rhetoric of the government have not
matched the situation on the ground. The age-old policies of ethnic
discrimination - mainly against Indo-Fijians - have continued.
The
figures ... show that Indo-Fijians make up a declining percentage of new
appointments and promotions from the period 2007-09.
This
performance sits uncomfortably with the historically large numbers of
Indo-Fijian graduates from all tertiary institutions in Fiji. Appointments
at the senior level are even further skewed in favour of military
personnel, and invariably, indigenous Fijians. None of the heads of
diplomatic missions is an Indo-Fijian and at present only three permanent
secretaries are Indo- Fijians.
The
non-racial and cohesive society that Prime Minister Bainimarama talks
about is a very noble ideal but his government should take heed of what is
happening on the ground. Otherwise, his vision for Fiji will remain a
vision only on paper. Conclusion The past three surveys on Fiji - by Chand
(2007), Prasad and Narayan (2008) and Mahadevan (2009) - have observed
that the Fijian economy has been merely kept afloat by short-term and
stop-gap policies. In 2009, there was hope that the economy would make
some recovery; instead it contracted by 2.5 per cent (Government of Fiji
2009a).
This
contraction has been attributed to the impacts of the global economic
crisis in late 2008 and 2009 and floods in early 2009. The major sectors
that contracted in 2009 include transport, storage and communications,
wholesale and retail trade, agriculture and forestry, manufacturing,
public administration and defence, education, health and social work, and
hotels and restaurants. Sectors such as construction, which were expected
to grow in 2009, remained sluggish. While the poor economic growth of the
past three years can be partially attributed to the impact of natural
disasters, the high food and fuel prices of 2007 and 2008 and the global
economic crisis, the basic cause of the sluggish economic recovery after
the 2006 coup is the perceived political instability and uncertainty about
future economic policies. If one looks at other Pacific island on hold.
Our development partners and bilateral partners would have reason to
engage further with the government.
The
government must realise that confidence is the key to our future.
The
current assessment is that people expect continuing high levels of
uncertainty and therefore many are making plans to leave the country. A
country from which people wish to leave is one where progress is hard to
come by. After the 1987 coups it was mainly Indo-Fijians who left the
country. Since the 2000 coup, however, and especially after the 2006 coup,
many skilled indigenous Fijians have been leaving. The country's human
capital continues to bleed as qualified people leave our shores. Narsey
(2010) provides a useful analysis of the demographic changes that have
taken place in the past 20 years. The Indo-Fijian population is already
down to 37 per cent and Narsey projects that it could be down to 26 per
cent by 2027. Indo-Fijians continue to leave the country in large numbers.
Home |